Indian Schools

Native American Assimilation into Western Culture Throughout the 1800s and the early 1900s, the American government attempted to assimilate Native American children into the Western culture, with all the best intentions (Marr Intro). Through primary and secondary sources, we learn how this was done and the mistakes they made in doing it. Primary sources, which are documents or other sources of information created at or near the time an event occurred, are an essential part in understanding history.There are many primary sources in the essay â€Å"Assimilation Through Education: Indian Boarding Schools in the Pacific Northwest† by Carolyn J. Marr including: photographs, transcripts, journal entries, and government documents. The use of photographs has many advantages and disadvantages. Photographs are fairly accurate in describing an event. It gives the reader plenty of evidence and a feel for how the subjects were feeling during the event by showing emotions or facial expressi ons that could not be expressed through written word.On the other hand, they could be very biased as to show the harshest or best conditions possible. A photo is just a brief snapshot of a moment in time, and does not illustrate a whole event that a diary or journal might tell. Also, a photographer may be biased towards their own personal views, age, religion, social, economic, or political background; all of which may influence what he or she will or won’t photograph. Lastly, it is also not always clear where a photo was taken, why, and by whom. Secondary sources prove to serve a very important role in interpreting history.They include documents, books, or articles, through interpretations by historians. Some books and documents used in Marr’s essay are: Carey C. Collins’ â€Å"Oregon's Carlisle: Teaching ‘America? at Chemawa Indian School†, Carey C. Collins’ â€Å"Through the Lens of Assimilation: Edwin L. Chalcraft and Chemawa Indian Scho ol†, and Michael C. Coleman’s American Indian Children at School. These sources explain the government’s efforts to assimilate (the act of becoming part of something) Indians, particularly children, into the melting pot of American society. This took place from the 1800s through the 1920s (Marr Intro).I believe it was necessary for the government to attempt to introduce Indians into the American culture, but I do not believe they did it correctly. Greatening education, broadening religious and cultural views, and creating strong bonds between other students were some of the advantages of this movement. Kids also received running water, electricity, decent food and clean clothes. Unfortunately, the evil done greatly outweighed the good. They stole children away from their parents and it was done so rapidly, it didn’t allow Indians to try and move themselves and their children into western culture.Taking away their free will, tearing them away from their par ents, offering poor diets, overcrowding schools, poor medical attention, and excessive forced labor by the students proved to be some of the mistakes made by the government’s push into the â€Å"American† culture (Marr Part V). The institutions stressed work-related training to benefit the institution rather than the children, similar to slavery. It allowed the institutions to spend less by forcing free labor onto the children in fields such as: farming, cooking, cleaning, blacksmithing, carpentry, etc. Marr Part IV). This reduced the hired work required to run the large institutions. This type program allowed the students to learn trade one needs to survive, but for those who had ambitions to become something more, the institution would not allow it (Marr Part IV). In closing, Native American culture was attacked by our government in an attempt to better their lives. Unfortunately, they provided an atmosphere of slavery and oppression in the most literal interpretatio n of the words. Works Cited Collins, Carey C. â€Å"Oregon's Carlisle: Teaching ‘America? t Chemawa Indian School,† Columbia: The Magazine of Northwest History, Tacoma: Washington State Historical Society, Summer 1998. Collins, Carey C. â€Å"Through the Lens of Assimilation: Edwin L. Chalcraft and Chemawa Indian School,† Oregon Historical Quarterly v. 98, no. 14 (Winter 1997-98): 390-425. Coleman, Michael C. American Indian Children at School, 1950-1930. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1993. Marr, Carolyn J. â€Å"Assimilation Through Education: Indian Boarding Schools in the Pacific Northwest. † UW Libraries Digital Collections. Web. 09 Sept. 2010. .

Unit 64

Beth Mcpherson Unit 064 Context and Principles for Early Years Provisions. 064. 1. 1 The 4 different principles that the EYFS covers are a unique child, positive relationships, enabling environments and learning development. Every child is a unique child who is constantly learning and can be resilient, capable, confident and self-assured. Practitioners understand and observe each child’s development and learning, assess progress and plans for next steps. They support babies and children to develop a positive sense of their own identity and culture also identify any need for additional support.The practitioner will keep the children safe and value and respect all children and families equally. Children learn to be strong and independent through positive relationships. Positive relationships are warm and loving, and foster a sense of belonging, sensitive and responsive to the children’s needs and families. Supportive of the children’s own efforts and independence a nd also consistent in setting clear boundaries. Stimulating the child and built on key persons relationships in the early year’s settings.Children learn and develop well in enabling environments, in which their experiences respond to their individual needs and there is a strong partnership between practitioners and parents and carers. Enabling environments means valuing all people and value learning they offer stimulating resources, relevant to all the children’s cultures and communities. Rich learning opportunities through play and playful teaching and support for children to take risks and explore. 064. 1. 2 064. 1. 3 064. 3. 1 064. 3. 2 064. 3. 3 064. 3. 4

Umqua Bank Case Study - 1081 Words

Organizational Culture According to Clayton Christensen, â€Å"organizational culture affects and regulates the way members of an organization, think, feel and act within the framework of that organization.† (Christensen, 2006) In the case of Umpqua Bank, the organizational culture is so unique that both employees and customers embrace it. Umpqua is not just a bank, it’s a way of life and the experience you feel at this organization should surpass any banking experience you’ve had. In reviewing this case study, it’s interesting to see how culture is embraced at all levels of the banking experience. Since culture is the result of norms, values and common experiences within close working groups, I’m going to focus my analysis of Umpqua’s†¦show more content†¦The various branches at Umpqua have more of a divisional structure as each branch operates independently. Yes, they follow protocols and standards, but in theory, also compete within one another. The ROQ accolades were awarded based on a branch’s success. The case study also referenced the autonomy that universal associates had in servicing customers, and that is consistent with a divisional structure. In evaluating Umpqua’s hybrid structure with its organizational culture, there is a good relationship between the two. Umpqua has a unique culture that extends to both the employees and customers, which requires oversight, training and flexibility within each branch. The hybrid structure complements this as there is influence from the top, but enough autonomy at bottom. Humboldt Bank Integration (Yellow Team) What: †¢ Integrating Humboldt bank into Umpqua. †¢ 4 banks/27 branches would need to be converted within the next 18 – 36 months. Who: †¢ Steve May, Executive Vice President of Cultural Enhancement oversees the Humboldt integration. How/When: †¢ Integration should be in various phases. Training of employees operations, Initial re-brand and full renovation. †¢ Training of employees operations staff should take place immediately. During this phase, there would be a

America Should End Its War On Drugs - 1974 Words

America Should End its War on Drugs Mark Julius Floresca West Coast University Abstract America is spending 15 billion dollars every year to fund and support the War on Dugs (â€Å"Drug War Statistic,† 2015). I agree and support that America should end its War on Drugs. This war has been ongoing for four decades and America seems like its not going to win sooner. The nation is spending billions of dollars every year just to support this war on drugs. Also, this War has caused many non-violent people to be incarcerated because of possessing a small amount of drug. People might think that the Government will eventually end the War on Drugs and come out the victor but that will never happen anytime soon. Instead of wasting time, money and†¦show more content†¦Many people are still against this debate, but ending the War on Drugs will cause less violence and achieve peace on this issue. America has wasted too much time and effort fighting in the War on Drugs. It has been four decades since President Richard Nixon declared the War on Drugs on 1971 (â€Å"Brief History of the Drug War,† 2015). This war is also considered to be one of the longest in America and it is still ongoing like some foreign wars in the Middle East. The War on Drugs is not only located in America but it is also located around the globe from South America, Afri ca, Asia, Australia and Europe. It might give you a thought that illegal drugs are corrupting the world, but more countries are gradually finding a solution and ending their War on Drugs. Portugal in example has ended their War on Drugs. How? It is because they decriminalized the use of illegal drugs rather than legalizing it (Kain. E, 2011). Keep in mind that legalizing and decriminalizing does not have the same meaning. Legalizing would mean that illegal drugs now considered legal could be obtainable in any type of markets and the public can consume it without consequence. In terms of decriminalizing, a person who posses a small amount of an illegal drug can be charged of treatment, fine or nothing at all. However, crimes are charged for people who are producing, distributing and selling. Drug abuse was cut in half in about a decade after this policy was passed in

Sex Trafficking Is Modern Day Slavery - 1175 Words

Sex trafficking is basically modern day slavery. It’s terrible, sex traffickers use violence, threats, and lies to compel and trick not only adults, but innocent children to get involved in commercial sex acts against their will. Not only that, but in different countries like Algeria and Cuba they are also dealing with sex trafficking but sometimes the children or adults are used and forced labor upon them. It’s sad and sickening. These sex traffickers take these people and children away from their lives, drug them up, and use them. It is inhumane and countries that have deal with this issue have families wondering where their children are at, who they are with, what they’re doing, if they’re still even alive. According to the U.S†¦show more content†¦In Algeria, people would try to enter the country voluntarily but illegally. Usually the people entering Algeria illegally are Sub-Saharan african woman or men attempting to travel to Europe. They think they’re getting assistance in illegally entering Algeria, but to the traveler’s misfortune, the sex traffickers end up deceiving them and end up taking the children or adults between the ages of about thirteen or twenty. The crazy thing is, according to U.S State Department(2012), The â€Å"chairmen,† or leaders, of the â€Å"African villages†Ã¢â‚¬â€small non-Algerian ethnic enclaves located in and around the southern city of Tamanrasset—may be among those responsible for forcing some women into prostitution. Also, Some sub-Saharan men, mainly from Mali, are forced into labor. The government of Algeria seems to not be making any significant efforts in trying to stop sex traffickers. Even after about a year, the Algerian government still did not hold any perpetrators of sex trafficking accountable for their stupid actions. Their government lacks adequate in measures to protect sex and human trafficking victims. They conflated both human traf ficking and smuggling, so sex and human trafficking victims were just seen as illegal immigrants trying to illegally enter Algeria. They were bound to be arrested and deported. Innocent Algerian woman are raped, forced into

Soledad is the Spanish word Essay Example For Students

Soledad is the Spanish word Essay Soledad is the Spanish word for loneliness. Discuss the significance of this in the novel Of Mice and Men.  Soledad is the Spanish word for loneliness. The novel represents this as it was set in America of the 1930s. This was a time of poverty and hardship as a result of The American Depression.  Steinbeck focuses on these issues and emotions that men faced during this time. Work was scarce, so men had to travel to find work. In doing this they had to leave loved ones, causing them to feel isolated and lonely. We can see this happening in the novel, especially through the character Candy. Also, racism was a big issue during this time. Steinbeck shows this and the emotions of people through Crooks. Steinbeck highlights other issues that were happening during this time. I will discuss how these affected the men in Of Mice and Men and how it caused isolation and loneliness. Loneliness especially affects Curleys wife in the novel. She doesnt have a name in the story; she is just referred to as Curleys wife. I think that this isolates her from everyone. Its as if she is not a part of the ranch. To get attention, she flirts with all the men. But, no one at the ranch likes her because she is such a flirt and because she is married to Curley and no one wants to get into any trouble with him. Any you boys seen Curley? This shows that she is looking for her husband but really she is just looking for attention from the ranchers. When Lennie is in the barn on his own one day Curleys wife comes in. George told Lennie not to talk to Curleys Wife in case he gets in trouble. But she sits down next to him and they start talking. She tells us about how she only married Curley to aggravate her mother. She also says how unhappy she is with him. I dont like Curley. He aint a nice fella. This shows that she is really unhappy with him and maybe regrets marrying him. When she was younger, she was asked by a man to work in the pictures with him; he told her she was a natural. But her mother didnt like it. She thinks that her mother hid the letter from her so she couldnt go. I never got that letter, I always thought my ol lady stole it. I think that this shows that her mother wasnt very nice and she had a tough childhood, this may have led her to do the things she does now (flirting) as she never got any attention when she was at home. In the novel, the two main characters are George and Lennie. They both suffer from loneliness but in two different ways. Lennie is lonely because he is quite stupid and doesnt think about what he is doing. Because of this, people judge him before they know him. Curley is one of the worst people to do this to him. Curley doesnt like tall people so he picks a fight on Lennie. Lennie didnt want a fight and I think what Curley did and the fact that people misjudge Lennie makes him feel as if George is his only friend. On the other hand, George does get annoyed at Lennie sometimes because he doesnt think before he acts. Lennie and George have to keep running away from places and find new work. We gotta sneak out in the dark and get outta the country. This shows that Lennie has done something wrong but George is there for him to get him out of the country and to a safe place before he gets in trouble. .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 , .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .postImageUrl , .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 , .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38:hover , .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38:visited , .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38:active { border:0!important; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38:active , .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38 .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4bdf85220f0f56ceff02ac847076ce38:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Ideals of a Victorian man EssayAnother reason why Lennie feels lonely is because he likes to pet soft things like mice and rabbits. But he used to pet them to hard and he would kill them. This made him feel lonely as whatever he did, even if he tried his best not to kill them, they would die. For example what happened to his pup, why do you got to get killed? and now maybe George aint gonna let me tend no rabbits, if he fins out you got killed. In these quotes we can see that he is very upset by his pups death and that he thinks George will be mad at him for killing it.

Why did the police in 1888 never catch Jack the Ripper free essay sample

In the autumn of 1888, an air of mystery and terror cloaked and surrounded the city of London. An unidentified murderer who had given himself the name Jack the Ripper was loose on the streets of the east end, killing and mutilating innocent women whilst the police seemed helpless, unable to catch the killer. But why was Jack the Ripper never caught? In this essay I will investigate the reasons why the infamous murderer was never caught, including how the press interfered, how the area itself prevented the police from finding out who Jack the Ripper was and argue that the main cause was the police themselves. Interference from the press is one example of how the police’s investigation was hindered, the Whitechapel murderers caused a massive amount of press coverage across the country, the police soon became suspicious and wary due to the idea of the articles alerting suspects of their lines of inquiry. We will write a custom essay sample on Why did the police in 1888 never catch Jack the Ripper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Journalists would even go so far as to follow detectives, hoping for information to be revealed. Furthermore, they would make up false leads and suspects and publish them which would prevent the investigation from moving forward. As well is this, there is a theory that the famous ‘Dear Boss’ letter, said to be written by Jack the Ripper himself, was actually a hoax written by the press to generate more interest in the story. This would most definitely obstruct the police’s investigation and therefore would prevent Jack the Ripper from being caught. The press would have helped Jack the Ripper indirectly, with every new lead they published and suspect they claimed to be the murderer, the true Jack the Ripper’s identity would get further and further away from the police’s grasp. If the letter was genuine, there is evidence within the letter to suggest that Jack the Ripper was not actually a doctor, a lead which the police looked into thoroughly â€Å"I saved some of the proper red stuff in a ginger beer bottle over the last job to write with but it went thick like glue and I can’t use it. † Meaning the murderer did not even know about blood coagulation, this meant that the police may have wasted a lot of their time on a false lead. Not only did the press hinder the police investigation, but the actual area in which the murders took place could help Jack the Ripper get away from the police. Whitechapel at the time was practically a maze, especially at night; twists and turns with dark alleys, making escape from murder scenes much easier, Whitechapel wasn’t just hard to navigate through- the only source of light would be the occasional flickering lamp. Combine this with a dense fog and it would have been practically impossible, not just to catch Jack the Ripper at the scene of the crime, but to actually see him. â€Å"The sights and signs are an apocalypse of evil† This line was written by a reporter working for the Weekly Herald who visited Whitechapel at the time of the murders, he also described Whitechapel as â€Å"a network of narrow, dark, and crooked lanes, every one apparently containing some headquarters of infamy†. These quotes offer a view of Whitechapel that can help you to understand how Jack the Ripper could escape from crime scenes so easily as well as move around the area without being detected by the police. Furthermore, it would have been very difficult to get around the area quickly when there was a murder, there were no tram lines so they would have to get there by foot, this lessened the chance of them catching Jack the Ripper at the scene of the murder or where there had been sightings. The methods that Jack the Ripper used to kill his victims can also be seen as a reason to why he was never caught. His victims themselves seem to be completely random and opportunistic; this would have made sure that his next victim would remain a mystery. Jack the Ripper evidently knew what he was doing, this is shown in the way he cut their throats, in such a direction that the blood would not go onto his clothing, another reason why it looks as if Jack the Ripper had medical knowledge was because of how he removed his victim’s organs. There was no evidence that could be traced back to the murderer and there seemed to be no motive other than killing prostitutes, this meant that the victims would not be linked in any way to Jack the Ripper. With every victim Jack the Ripper killed, the violence escalated. What started with a simple cut across their throat ended with an extremely gruesome murder in which Mary Jane Kelly’s body was mutilated completely. This was the last canonical Ripper murder. One significant issue that contributed to the police’s inability to catch Jack the Ripper was the vast amount of witnesses providing contradictory details on suspects, on top of the actual amount of suspects themselves. According to casebook. org, over five hundred people have been seen as suspects by numerous theorists , despite the lack of evidence backing up the majority of them. Witnesses of the Whitechapel murders who claim to have seen Jack the Ripper gave such a diverse range of possibilities that it was impossible to create a single suspect profile. In addition to this, Jack the Ripper theorist, Nicole Ward, suggests that â€Å"The majority of the population of Whitechapel had issues with alcohol†, inferring that the witnesses were often unreliable, and therefore the few statements that have been obtainable are not necessarily accurate in their description. This hamper the police’s ability to catch Jack the Ripper . Throughout the police force in 1888 there was a lack of experience of this kind of killer. Even now, although the police have much better technology, serial killers can still be extremely hard to be caught, this is because of their motives, Jack the Ripper has been labelled by many experts as a hedonistic type of serial killer, meaning a serial killer who seeks thrill and who gets pleasure from killing. This means that they would not be able to predict who Jack the Ripper would target next because it is very unlikely he even knew his victims beforehand. In addition to this, there were not very many detectives that had been trained to carry out investigations on such a large scale, they needed to question thousands of witnesses and suspects, many of which were lying. Add this factor to how many leads the police had to follow and you can see how much work the police would have had to do. Also, the attitude towards the police from the public themselves was not a positive one. At the time, the police used force against those in Whitechapel so the majority of the residents were against the police and therefore were unhelpful. Another reason as to why the public did not cooperate as well as they could have was because of the lack of reward for information, you can understand why the police did this as they would not want to receive false information that would waste their time. Thus they relied on the public to provide information because they wanted to help them and not just so they would get a reward. Unfortunately, in 1888, the most advanced part of forensic science was analysing footprints which were situated at the scene of the crime. There was no blood or DNA analysis which definitely would have been significant with regards to one of the only physical pieces of evidence-the leather apron; this is a drastic difference to nowadays where it is possible to identify someone by a strand of hair. In addition to this, a large amount of the original evidence has been lost over the years despite the fact there wasn’t that much evidence to begin with, as Jack the Ripper left little evidence of his crimes. At the time, for the police to catch the criminal, they had to catch them in the act of doing a crime, get them to confess or have an accomplice report them. None of these things happened in this case, so because of how basic the police’s methods were, with very little technology to help them, it meant that they were very unlikely to catch Jack the Ripper in the first place, especially since it is very unlikely Jack the Ripper had an accomplice. Not only is the lack of forensic evidence a reason why the police were not able to catch Jack the Ripper but the police’s actual methods can also be blamed. The police’s lines of questioning were very narrow, only asking those who lived in the immediate area and excluding the fact that many residents of Whitechapel moved around and out of the area. They also only questioned certain groups of people because of the idea that the murderer must have medical or anatomical knowledge to murder the way in which they did. â€Å"No mere slaughterer of animals could have carried out this operation. It must have been from someone accustomed to the post-mortem room. † This quote from a coroner which talked to the Pall Mall Gazette about the Whitechapel murders was published on the 27th September 1888, it was a statement the police did not take into account and this was probably not the only statement they ignored. If they had paid attention to some of the witnesses it could have saved them a lot of time and might have helped them catch Jack the Ripper. In conclusion, there are many reasons as to why Jack the Ripper was never caught. One of these would be the press and how they interfered with the case. Another example would be how the area of Whitechapel assisted Jack the Ripper with his murders. What’s more, witness statements completely disagreed with each other and therefore prevented an accurate suspect profile from being created. There was a large quantity of people suspected to be Jack the Ripper. Additionally, the public’s negative attitude towards the police meant they would not be cooperative. Lack of technology, DNA and forensic analysis also hindered the investigation and meant they would only be able to catch Jack the Ripper if they caught him at the scene or he confessed. Individually each of these reasons can be seen as a case as to why the police never caught Jack the Ripper however it is only by looking at all of the reasons that we can get the bigger picture. The strongest argument why Jack the Ripper was never caught is the police’s methods and how they went about the case.